Project:New studies to add

Publications that describe symbiotic interactions that are not yet in the database.

Guidelines:

• Please list the DOI, or link to the publication full-text if a DOI is not available. A full citation is not necessary as the publication metadata can be retrieved from CrossRef with the DOI.
• If necessary, comment briefly on what information in the publication should be added to the database.
• Preprints can be listed here, but should only be added as database entries when a peer-reviewed version is published
• Remove entries from the list when the database has been updated.

Ciliates

• https://agro.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-443d0e0e-63a9-4de1-8030-60c431e77f83 Endosymbionts in Blepharisma japonicum (full text not yet found)
• https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01809-w large scale study of ciliate associated bacteria, from single-ciliate-cell amplification libraries, but doesn't appear to have a table of which bacteria is associated with which ciliate?
• https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92677-1 Endosymbionts in Paramecium book
• https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92677-1_6 Diversity of Endosymbiotic Bacteria in Paramecium - in progress, stopped before section 5
• https://doi.org/10.1016/S0932-4739(11)80401-3 Endosymbionts in Paramecium calkinsi
• link flagellated endosymbionts in a Frontonia sp.
• https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae117 general review on ciliate symbioses

Trichomonas

• https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01188 Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma spp associated with Trichomonas vaginalis, detected by PCR from T. vaginalis cultures

Amoebae

• Item:Q1742 (no DOI, original URL defunct, archived at Internet Archive) - morphological description of Pelomyxa spp. symbionts
• https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0906-1 Acanthamoeba isolates containing chlamydia
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095166 Neochlamydia in Acanthamoeba spp.
• https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/detail/o:1356651.pdf Unpublished Masters thesis on chlamydial intranuclear symbiont of Naegleria clarki ("Pn")

Forams

• https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48166-5 bacteria related to sulfur cycling enriched in forams
• https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2017.09.001 Review of prokaryotes associated with benthic forams, see their table 1
• https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200198119 Desulfobacteraceae associated with denitrifying forams Globobulimina spp. (10 species studied, also associated with other bacteria, only metagenomics applied, no FISH or TEM; have to check which MAGs linked to which foram; list of MAG accessions is in their Table S7)
• https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.6.1879 intracellular bacteria in Ammonia beccarrii under anoxic conditions

Termite gut flagellates

• https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.03.592298 Preprint on facultative methanogen endosymbiont of termite gut protist
• https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.94.3.697 Motility symbiont(s) of a devescovinid flagellate
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233065 ASV study of gut protist associated microbes in Reticulitermes flavipes
• https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.me17096 Cospeciation of Teranympha and Eucomonympha with spirochaete symbionts
• https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2007.06.004 Spirochaete ectosymbionts of flagellates from Mastotermes darwiniensis
• https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.1.625-633.2003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00750.x Spirochaete ectosymbionts of termite gut flagellates
• https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00564.x EM study of symbionts from Barbulanympha and Urinympha from Cryptocercus punctulatus; intracellular localization observed
• https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00826-24 Endomicrobia comparative genomics, but no information on protist hosts; their table S3 lists bacterial MAGs, but termite host names are in separate Table S1, and no systematic information is provided on the protist hosts
• https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13038 Review of protist symbionts of termites
• https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=18ac2be7fd364d7871888f06b24b0d15223c7b9f#page=40 TEM study of symbionts in Joenia annectens; the intranuclear symbiont appears not to have been reported elsewhere

Other

• https://www.jstor.org/stable/43336527 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1982.tb01611.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1983.tb01673.x Apparent "symbionts" of Chrysostephanosphaera and Lepochromulina in extracellular matrix, described as "refractive bodies" elsewhere (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1998.tb01545.x), probably not bacteria
• Item:Q1104 - Check that examples listed in their table are included in DB
• https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-82369-z presence of intracellular bacteria briefly mentioned
• https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk1075 argues that UCYN-A should be considered an organelle, rather than an endosymbiont
• https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062650 review of cyanobacterial symbionts of microalgae -- the reference numbering in the supplementary table appears to be incorrect, I cannot trace the cited studies
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301343 Potential bacterial symbionts of Alexandrium catenella
• https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01440 Heterotrophic ?diazotrophs associated with dinoflagellate-cyanobacteria consortia